ArticleSurgical case reports2024
Intussusception of the appendix secondary to endometriosis: a case report.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Appendiceal inversion secondary to endometriosis and dilated mucinous adenoma identified on screening colonoscopy.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Unmasking the false cecal polyp: a case of inverted appendix-a case report and review of the literature.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntussusception of the appendiceal endometriosis is rare. Although approximately 200 cases of appendiceal intussusception have been reported in the literature, very few have ever been diagnosed preoperatively. Here, we report the case of intussusception of the appendiceal endometriosis with laparoscopic ileocecal resection. CASE PRESENTATION: A woman in her 50s presented to the out-patients clinic with epigastric pain lasting for a several month. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning revealed ileocolic intussusception in which a cecum polypoid mass lesion extended to the hepatic flexure of the ascending colon. A colonoscopy showed a large pedunculated polyp in the cecum. Laparoscopic ileocecal resection was performed. Pathology confirmed an invaginated appendix demonstrating endometriosis implants.
conclusionsPossible intrinsic causes of intussusception are varied, appendiceal intussusception secondary to endometriosis is extremely rare. Intussusception of the appendix is a rare finding, often mistaken for a polyp. We suggest considering inverted appendix as a differential diagnosis when investigating cecal lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.