Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39542938›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2024

Influence of photobiomodulation and radiofrequency on the healing of pressure lesions in mice.

Aline Santo Vieceli, Paulo Cesar Lock Silveira, Rubya Pereira Zaccaron, Marisa de Cássia Registro Fonseca, Aderbal Silva Aguiar-Junior, Lais Mara Siqueira das Neves, Heloyse Uliam Kuriki, Rafael Inacio Barbosa, Alexandre Marcio Marcolino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aline Santo VieceliLaboratory of Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus (LARAL), Department of Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Rua Pedro João Pereira, 150, room 111, Mato Alto, Araranguá, Santa Catarin, CEP 88905-120, Brazil.
Paulo Cesar Lock SilveiraLaboratory of Experimental Physiopathology, Program of Postgraduate in Science of Health, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, 88806-000, Brazil.
Rubya Pereira ZaccaronLaboratory of Experimental Physiopathology, Program of Postgraduate in Science of Health, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, 88806-000, Brazil.
Marisa de Cássia Registro FonsecaPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Ribeirão Preto Medical School of the University of São Paulo (USP), Av. dos Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil.
Aderbal Silva Aguiar-JuniorFederal University of Santa Catarina, Laboratório Biologia do Exercício Físico (LaBioEx), Rua Pedro João Pereira, 150, Araranguá, Santa Catarina, CEP 88905-120, Brazil.
Lais Mara Siqueira das NevesPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Ribeirão Preto Medical School of the University of São Paulo (USP), Av. dos Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil.
Heloyse Uliam KurikiLaboratory of Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus (LARAL), Department of Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Rua Pedro João Pereira, 150, room 111, Mato Alto, Araranguá, Santa Catarin, CEP 88905-120, Brazil.
Rafael Inacio BarbosaLaboratory of Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus (LARAL), Department of Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Rua Pedro João Pereira, 150, room 111, Mato Alto, Araranguá, Santa Catarin, CEP 88905-120, Brazil.
Alexandre Marcio MarcolinoLaboratory of Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus (LARAL), Department of Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Rua Pedro João Pereira, 150, room 111, Mato Alto, Araranguá, Santa Catarin, CEP 88905-120, Brazil. alexandre.marcolino@ufsc.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to ascertain the impact of photobiomodulation and radiofrequency on the healing of pressure injuries in mice. A total of 70 animals were randomly assigned to seven experimental groups. A pressure injury was induced in the dorsal region of the mice by the application of two magnets. The photobiomodulation treatment was administered at a dosage of 3.6 J per session. In the radiofrequency group, the treatment time was four minutes and the power was 22 watts. The analyses included the lesion area, infrared thermography, and the collection of material for cytokine, histological, and histochemical analyses following euthanasia. In the macroscopic analyses, the 660 nm photobiomodulation group demonstrated superior outcomes in comparison to the control group. With regard to the microscopic analyses, the greatest difference between the groups was observed when TNF-α was evaluated in the photobiomodulation group. It can be observed that the groups irradiated by electrophysical means (i.e., a combination of radiofrequency with PBM 830 nm-660 nm) exhibited a positive influence on the repair process, with the greatest impact observed in the group irradiated by a combination of radiofrequency and 660 nm photobiomodulation.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyWound HealingAnimalsMaleMicePressure UlcerRadiofrequency TherapyThermographyTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaLow level laser therapyPressure ulcersSkinWound healing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.