ArticleLasers in medical science2024
Influence of photobiomodulation and radiofrequency on the healing of pressure lesions in mice.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to ascertain the impact of photobiomodulation and radiofrequency on the healing of pressure injuries in mice. A total of 70 animals were randomly assigned to seven experimental groups. A pressure injury was induced in the dorsal region of the mice by the application of two magnets. The photobiomodulation treatment was administered at a dosage of 3.6 J per session. In the radiofrequency group, the treatment time was four minutes and the power was 22 watts. The analyses included the lesion area, infrared thermography, and the collection of material for cytokine, histological, and histochemical analyses following euthanasia. In the macroscopic analyses, the 660 nm photobiomodulation group demonstrated superior outcomes in comparison to the control group. With regard to the microscopic analyses, the greatest difference between the groups was observed when TNF-α was evaluated in the photobiomodulation group. It can be observed that the groups irradiated by electrophysical means (i.e., a combination of radiofrequency with PBM 830 nm-660 nm) exhibited a positive influence on the repair process, with the greatest impact observed in the group irradiated by a combination of radiofrequency and 660 nm photobiomodulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39542938What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.