Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39542925›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024

Cisternostomy associated with decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adriano M Lino-Filho, Mateus Neves Faria Fernandes, Otávio Augusto De Paula Mendes Teixeira, Wander Nasser Naves, Lórimer Sandoval Carneiro, Bernardo Drummond-Braga

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adriano M Lino-FilhoDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Mateus Neves Faria FernandesDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Otávio Augusto De Paula Mendes TeixeiraDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Wander Nasser NavesDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Lórimer Sandoval CarneiroDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Bernardo Drummond-BragaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. bernardodrummond@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8027-0929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been the main surgical treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) for decades. Basal cisternostomy emerged as a novel option in brain trauma, with results still unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cisternostomy added to conventional DC versus DC alone for the treatment of TBI. This study was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Three databases were systematically searched for studies comparing cisternostomy + DC versus DC alone. Primary outcomes were overall mortality, length of stay in ICU care, duration of mechanical ventilation. Review Manager was used for statistical analysis and I

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticDecompressive CraniectomyAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBasal cisternostomyDecompressive craniectomyTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39542925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.