ArticleArchives of dermatological research2024
Hospitalist-performed skin biopsy in the diagnosis of skin disease.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In hospitalized patients, dermatologist intervention can lead to rapid identification and treatment of skin disease. However, many medical centers lack a specialized dermatologist, so skin biopsies might instead be performed by hospitalists. We aimed to determine the impact of skin biopsies performed by hospitalists on the diagnosis of skin conditions. Included in this study were adult patients who had skin biopsies performed for skin conditions by hospitalists at our hospital between 2012 and 2022. We retrospectively analyzed the diagnostic contribution rate before and after skin biopsy. Skin biopsies were performed on 49 patients, with 37 patients (75.5%) having biopsy in one location, 5 patients (10.2%) in two locations, and 7 patients (14.3%) in three locations. The average age was 63.5 [20.2] years, 55% of the patients were male and 12% had an in-hospital dermatologist consultation prior to assessment. IgA vasculitis was suspected in 9 patients (18.4%), and vasculitis, erythema nodosum, and intravascular lymphoma were each suspected in 4 patients (8.2%), respectively. IgA vasculitis was ultimately diagnosed in 10 patients (20.4%), polyarteritis nodosa in 3 patients (6.1%), and erythema nodosa in 3 patients (6.1%). Skin biopsy performed by hospitalists had a diagnostic contribution of 75.5%, with a change in diagnosis of 30.6% and a change in therapy of 14.3%. There was no difference in the rate of treatment changes according to the type of skin condition. Hospitalist-performed skin biopsies are suggested by our results to be limited, but still informative in healthcare facilities without a dedicated dermatologist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39542924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.