ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Bibliometric Analysis of Hot Trends and Future Prospects in Clinical Fat Research from 2014 to 2023.
Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of Complications from Ear Filler Injections: A Cadaver Imaging and Anatomical Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Embolization of Ophthalmic Artery Induced By Ear Hyaluronic Acid Injection.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSignificant advancements have been made in the field of clinically relevant fat research over the past decade. A systematic analysis of publications in this domain is essential. This study aims to identify research hotspots and evolving trends in clinically relevant adipose tissue research through bibliometric analysis.
methodsPublications related to fat clinical research from 2014 to 2023 were extracted and analyzed from the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection database. The data from this 10-year period were divided into two 5-year intervals (2014-2018 and 2019-2023) for analysis. Various aspects such as author keywords, countries, institutions, authors, and journal co-occurrence were studied. The data were analyzed and visualized using VOSviewer.
resultsAfter selecting the retrieval strategy, a total of 892 publications were extracted for the period 2014-2018 and 1622 publications for 2019-2023. Comparing the two intervals, the United States was the country with the highest number of publications (354 publications vs. 546 publications). The institution with the highest output was Peking Union Medical College (26 publications vs. 87 publications). The most prolific author was Klinger M (4 publications) vs. Hua Zuguang (18 publications). The most active journal was Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (178 publications) vs. Aesthetic Surgery Journal (244 publications). The most active research areas were focused on "fat grafting," "liposuction," and "body contouring," with a rapid increase in research related to "facial rejuvenation" using fat grafting, suggesting it may be the next research hotspot.
conclusionClinical research related to fat is rapidly evolving. This study provides a visual network and trend analysis of fat research over the past decade. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39542895What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.