ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2024
[Cell salvage in obstetrics-Background and practical implementation].
Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, with an increasing incidence in western countries over the past decades. During this period the numbers of PPH-related allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions have also significantly increased. Given the increasing scarcity and risks of allogeneic RBC transfusions, which are also associated with adverse maternal outcomes, optimized blood management strategies are urgently needed in obstetrics. In recent years, patient blood management (PBM) has been increasingly integrated into medical care, resulting in a significant improvement in patient outcomes. Cell salvage (CS) is one of the PBM blood-sparing techniques that enables the collection, processing and retransfusion of the patient's own blood during major bleeding events. Although recent evidence indicates that CS can significantly reduce the demand for allogeneic RBC transfusions and improve patient outcomes, the utilization in obstetrics in German hospitals remains low, with a usage rate of only 0.07% of births with peripartum hemorrhage. It must be assumed that concerns about patient-related complications, such as amniotic fluid embolism and maternal alloimmunization contribute to this hesitancy, alongside a lack of familiarity with the technique. This article provides an overview of the current evidence on the use and safety of CS in obstetrics. To facilitate a practical implementation, fundamental considerations and organizational precautions were prepared based on the experiences of the University Hospitals in Würzburg and Frankfurt and presented in the form of graphics and checklists for the perioperative use of CS during cesarean sections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.