ArticleClinical therapeutics2024
The Role of Sex and Gender in Precision Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review and Proposed Hierarchy.
Article in Clinical therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrecision medicine utilizes individual patient data to guide decision making. Sex and gender medicine is likewise focused on individual patients' biological sex or sociocultural gender as determinants of disease. How these two fields intersect with one another and with acute care medicine is unclear.
methodsWe conducted a scoping literature review utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews to evaluate the primary research in three related areas: sex & gender medicine, emergency medicine, and precision medicine. We searched six databases and screened eligible studies for inclusion. Included studies were reviewed in full, and study characteristics were compiled using a standardized data extraction form. Research questions were drafted by workgroup members and ranked by all participants of the consensus conference.
resultsA total of 401 studies were screened for inclusion. Of these, 70 met inclusion criteria and were evaluated in full text. The majority (84%, 59/70) reported evaluating sex, whereas only 16% (11/70) reported evaluating gender. The most common clinical topics were cardiovascular diseases and trauma/injury prevention, comprising 50% (35/70) of the included manuscripts. Cumulatively, 77% (54/70) of the manuscripts reviewed cited at least one funding source. The vast majority (66/70, 94%) of studies were included because their statistical analysis accounted for sex or gender, and very few studies (4/70, 6%) were included due to their use of biomarker or genomic data.
conclusionsSex- and gender-based medicine and research commonly employ precision medicine concepts to evaluate the effects of sex and gender in a variety of clinical topic areas, but much of this literature is not commonly described as precision medicine. We propose a hierarchy to categorize, label, and advance sex and gender precision medicine research. Fundamental to this advancement are implementation of guidelines regarding the correct use of sex and gender and continued research funding for sex and gender precision EM research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.