ArticleLife science alliance2025
Transcriptional regulators ensuring specific gene expression and decision-making at high TGFβ doses.
Article in Life science alliance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- NADBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in the central nervous system: A potential therapeutic target to combat age-related vascular fragility.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025Review
- JunB-HBZ nuclear translocation by TGF-β is a key driver in HTLV-1-mediated leukemogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Modeling the dynamics of EMT reveals genes associated with pan-cancer intermediate states and plasticity.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
TGFβ-signaling regulates cancer progression by controlling cell division, migration, and death. These outcomes are mediated by gene expression changes, but the mechanisms of decision-making toward specific fates remain unclear. Here, we combine SMAD transcription factor imaging, genome-wide RNA sequencing, and morphological assays to quantitatively link signaling, gene expression, and fate decisions in mammary epithelial cells. Fitting genome-wide kinetic models to our time-resolved data, we find that most of the TGFβ target genes can be explained as direct targets of SMAD transcription factors, whereas the remainder show signs of complex regulation, involving delayed regulation and strong amplification at high TGFβ doses. Knockdown experiments followed by global RNA sequencing revealed transcription factors interacting with SMADs in feedforward loops to control delayed and dose-discriminating target genes, thereby reinforcing the specific epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition at high TGFβ doses. We identified early repressors, preventing premature activation, and a late activator, boosting gene expression responses for a sufficiently strong TGFβ stimulus. Taken together, we present a global view of TGFβ-dependent gene regulation and describe specificity mechanisms reinforcing cellular decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.