Trial reportRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2026
Transversus abdominis plane block in minimally invasive colon surgery: a multicenter three-arm randomized controlled superiority and non-inferiority clinical trial.
Trial report in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04311099 (Laparoscopic vs Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colon Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Laparoscopic vs Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colon Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Multicentre Clinical Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Laparoscopic- vs ultrasound-guided TAP block in colorectal surgery. A randomized controlled study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Trial
- The association between the cutaneous sensory block area, the surgical incision's location, and the block's analgesic efficacy: a post hoc sensitivity analysis of data from a controlled randomised multicentre trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Evidence Map of Pharmacologic and Non-Pharmacologic Perioperative Strategies for Managing Acute Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Surgery, 2012-2025: The M-PALS Collaborative.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is the most widely used abdominal field block in colorectal surgery with a postoperative enhanced recovery pathway. We aimed to determine whether the laparoscopic-assisted and ultrasound-guided TAP (US-TAP) blocks provide superior pain relief compared with placebo. We separately investigated whether the laparoscopic-assisted technique was non-inferior to the ultrasound-guided technique in providing pain relief, with a non-inferiority margin of 10 mg morphine dose equivalents.
methods340 patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colon surgery were randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) US-TAP block, (2) laparoscopic-assisted TAP (L-TAP) block, or (3) placebo. Superiority and non-inferiority were tested for the primary outcome: 24-hour postoperative morphine equivalent consumption. Secondary outcomes, including patient-reported quality of recovery, were included in the superiority analysis.
results127 patients were included in each block group and 86 in the placebo group. The US-TAP block was no different from placebo at -1.4 mg morphine (97.5% CI -6.8 to 4.0 mg; p=0.55). The L-TAP block was superior to placebo at -5.9 mg morphine (97.5% CI -11.3 to -0.5 mg; p=0.01) and non-inferior to the US-TAP block at -4.5 mg morphine (98.75% CI -10.0 to 1.1 mg).
conclusionThe L-TAP block was superior to placebo and non-inferior to the US-TAP block. However, neither met our predetermined estimate of the minimal clinically important difference of 10 mg morphine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04311099.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.