ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2024
[Double-Gap Model for life expectancy for Argentina].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this work, a probabilistic method is implemented to estimate the life expectancy of men and women by age; the Double GAP or Double Gap method. The application to the case of Argentina attempts to provide information on the phenomenon of population aging and its relationship with the pension system. Objective: Present estimates and projections of the life expectancy of men and women by age obtained through a probabilistic method that considers the differential by sex. Material and methods: The Double GAP or Double Gap method is estimated, and then the life expectancies at 60 and 65 years are selected (for women and men respectively), given that these are the retirement ages in Argentina and are present the forecasts and their corresponding confidence intervals. Results: The forecasts of the Double Gap model indicate that life expectancy in Argentina at both 60 and 65 years of age will grow slightly until 2025. For women it increases by half a year, while for men the growth in hope is slightly higher. The latter also shows a slow trend towards a convergence between male and female life expectancies. Conclusions: It is evident that Argentina is far from registering a record in life expectancy worldwide for these ages, because the life expectancy forecasts generated by the Double Gap model for the country are very far from the trend of good practices (series of maximums in life expectancy).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.