ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Improving the primary care clinical testing process in southwest Scotland: a systems-based approach.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcross all healthcare environments, inadequately specified patient test requests are commonly encountered and can lead to wasted clinician time and healthcare resources, in addition to either missed or unnecessary testing taking place.Before this work, in a general practice in Southwest Scotland, a mean value of 42% of test requests were already uploaded to ordercomms (a widely used system in general practice for designating clinical testing instructions) at patient presentation, leaving an opportunity for error and wasted clinician time/resources.
methodsPatient appointment records were retrospectively reviewed in a general practice in Southwest Scotland to monitor the proportion of test requests already uploaded to ordercomms at the time of patient presentation.The use of quality improvement tools and plan-do-study-act cycling allowed the testing of four change ideas attributable to different 'pathways' of origin for test requests.Change ideas included increasing clinician and secondary care/docman origin test requests already on ordercomms prior to patient presentation, reducing patient origin test requests and improving the test requesting system.
resultsThe percentage of test requests already on ordercomms at patient presentation increased from a mean of 42% to 89% over a 30 week test period. The use of test pre-set templates was a welcome intervention that was agreed to be made accessible to 30+ regional general practices.
conclusionThe use of pre-set templates for clinical testing encouraged a 47% rise in test requests already uploaded to ordercomms prior to patient presentation. This saved up to 90 min of clinician time weekly and ensured patients received the correct tests at the appropriate time.Our findings supported the use of pre-set testing templates, in combination with effective information communication, and were recommended for use in any clinical environment requiring patient testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.