Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39542515›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Private sector engagement for immunisation programmes: a pragmatic scoping review of 25 years of evidence on good practice in low-income and middle-income countries.

Gaurav Sharma, Christopher Morgan, Sarah Wanyoike, Stephanie Kenyon, Meru Sheel, Manish Jain, Malia Boggs, Folake Olayinka

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From Disparity to Integration: Transforming India's Immunization Strategy through Private Sector Engagement.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gaurav SharmaJhpiego, the Johns Hopkins University affiliate, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Gaurav.Sharma@jhpiego.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-3245
Christopher MorganJhpiego, the Johns Hopkins University affiliate, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0931-5474
Sarah WanyoikeThe Vaccine-Preventable Diseases Programme, Regional Office for Africa, World Health Organization, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.
Stephanie KenyonDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Meru SheelSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-070X
Manish JainPublic Health Consultant, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Malia BoggsPublic Health Institute, via United States Agency for International Development's Global Health Training, Advisory and Support Contract (GHTASC) project, Washington, Washington DC, USA.
Folake OlayinkaPublic Health Institute, via United States Agency for International Development's Global Health Training, Advisory and Support Contract (GHTASC) project, Washington, Washington DC, USA.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany National Immunisation Programmes attempt to leverage the private sector ; however, there is limited consolidated and synthesised documentation on good practices, gaps and lessons learnt. A 2017 WHO guidance document recommended best practices for private sector engagement (PSE) in immunisation. We conducted a pragmatic scoping review to identify gaps, update and consolidate evidence on promising practices in PSE for vaccination.

methodsBuilding on two previous reviews published in 2011 and 2017, we conducted a pragmatic scoping review of peer-reviewed publications from low-income and middle-income countries since September 2016 in PubMed that pertained to PSE and immunisation service delivery. We extracted and analysed findings using a new analytical framework covering motivations, enablers and barriers, risks and challenges, and engagement mechanisms.

resultsWe collated over 80 well-documented analyses of PSE for vaccination, derived from 54 peer-reviewed publications from 1998 to 2016 included in prior reviews, 21 new publications from 24 countries published since 2016 and 1 new systematic review. The level of PSE was mixed, ranging from 3%-4% to >60% of all childhood vaccinations. Promising practices for PSE included using governance and policy to leverage private providers' motivations and including them in programme efforts. Planning and monitoring efforts were effective when linked with regulatory requirements based on national standards for services, reporting and performance monitoring. Information systems were effective when they included private sector services in vaccine monitoring and surveillance. Challenges identified included ensuring compliance with national schedules and standards and minimising financial exclusion. Few studies documented successful public-private partnership models or other innovative financing models.

conclusionThe published evidence captures numerous strategies to facilitate stronger immunisation programme engagement with the private sector. Stronger PSE can potentially reach zero-dose and underimmunised populations in low-resource settings and build resilient systems. Untapped opportunities exist for more structured testing of approaches to inform global guidance.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesImmunization ProgramsPrivate SectorHumansGlobal HealthImmunisationPublic HealthVaccines

Identifiers

PMID39542515
PMCPMC11733070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.