Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39542469›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Bankart repair with remplissage and Latarjet procedure in shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss (STABLE): study protocol.

Moin Khan, Asheesh Bedi, Ryan Degen, Jon Warner, Mohit Bhandari, STABLE Investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05705479 (Shoulder Instability Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Stabilization Benefits Compared With Latarjet Procedure Evaluation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05705479 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Shoulder Instability Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Stabilization Benefits Compared With Latarjet Procedure Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled114ConditionsShoulder Dislocation, Sport Injuries, Anterior DislocationArmsBankart + Remplissage Procedure, Latarjet Procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moin KhanSurgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Khanmm2@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-8095
Asheesh BediNorthshore Orthopedics, Glendale, Illinois, USA.
Ryan DegenUniversity of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jon WarnerHarvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Mohit BhandariDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
STABLE Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecurrent shoulder dislocations often cause attrition of the labrum and progressive loss of the anterior bony contour of the glenoid. Treatment options for this pathology involve either soft tissue repair or bony augmentation procedure. The optimal management for patients with shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss remains unknown and current clinical practice is highly varied. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Shoulder instability Trial comparing Arthroscopic stabilisation Benefits compared with Latarjet procedure Evaluation (STABLE) is an ongoing multicentre, randomised controlled trial of 114 patients diagnosed with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and subcritical glenoid bone loss (10%-20%, measured on 3D CT using circle of best fit technique). Patients are randomised either arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart repair+remplissage) or open or arthroscopic coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure). The primary outcome of this trial will be the between-group difference in the change from baseline to 24 months postintervention in Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores. Secondary outcomes include: (1) rates of recurrent shoulder dislocations and symptoms of instability up to 24 months' postsurgery; (2) clinical outcomes measured by American Shoulder and Elbow Society score, Shoulder Activity Scale, EQ-5D and Patient Satisfaction Scale; (3) physical examination (range of motion, stability); (4) return to previous level of activity/sport; (5) rate of shoulder-related complications and serious adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB; project number 15998) prior to commencement of the trial. Results from the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal regardless of whether there are statistically significant findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05705479; this study was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyJoint InstabilityRecurrenceShoulder DislocationShoulder JointAdultFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeClinical TrialProtocols & guidelinesShoulder

Identifiers

PMID39542469
PMCPMC11575273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.