Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39542466›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

The Empty Office: protocol for sequential mixed-method study on the impact of telework activities on social relations and well-being.

Mattia Vacchiano, Guillaume Fernandez, Eric Widmer, Melanie Arntz, Manal Azzi, Abdi Bulti, Nicola Cianferoni, Stéphane Cullati, Sander Junte, Koorosh Massoudi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mattia VacchianoDepartment of Sociology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland mattia.vacchiano@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4916-8723
Guillaume FernandezDepartment of Sociology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Eric WidmerDepartment of Sociology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Melanie ArntzZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.
Manal AzziInternational Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abdi BultiDepartment of Sociology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nicola CianferoniState Secretariat for Economic Affairs, Bern, Switzerland.
Stéphane CullatiPopulation Health Laboratory, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Sander JunteAutonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Koorosh MassoudiUniversity of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Oscar Molina RomoAutonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Catalina RamirezInternational Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stephanie SteinmetzUniversity of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTeleworking is one of the most significant legacies of the pandemic. Great attention is now being paid to its effects on workers' health. One of the arguments that emerged on this issue is that 'working away from the office' affects the time we spend with significant others. This calls into question all those processes that make relatives and colleagues important to our health, such as forms of mentoring and social support, but also conflicts, work interruptions or control over workers' activities. So far, no study has evaluated the impact that teleworking has on these processes using data on personal networks. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The project draws on a total sample of 4400 participants from Switzerland, the Netherlands, Spain and Germany (n=1100 per country). The choice of these countries is due to their specificity and diversity in socioeconomic features, which make them particularly interesting for studying teleworking from a comparative point of view. The research is conceived as a sequential mixed-method design. First, quantitative data collection will administer an online questionnaire to gather information on telework modalities, health and well-being markers, and data on personal networks collected by a name generator. A qualitative module, administered one year later, will consist of in-depth interviews with a subsample (n=32) of teleworkers selected for delving narratively into the mechanisms identified with the quantitative analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has obtained 2 years of funding from the Swiss Network for International Study and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Geneva (CUREG-20230920-292-2). All participants will be asked to provide informed consent to participate in this study. The results will be shared with international organisations and disseminated in scientific journals and conferences. Fully anonymised data will be made available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) data-repository platform.

Indexed as

TeleworkingAdultCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleOccupational HealthResearch DesignSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplacePsychological StressPublic healthQuality of LifeResearch DesignSocial InteractionSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID39542466
PMCPMC11575321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.