Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39542463›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Exploring whether home-based neuromodulation can boost the analgesic effects of exercise in people with knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a double-blinded, pilot randomised controlled trial.

Keeley R McNally, Simon Summers, Tasha R Stanton, James McAuley, Wei-Ju Chang, Nahian Chowdhury, Rocco Cavaleri

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keeley R McNallySchool of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Simon SummersSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Tasha R StantonIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7106-4456
James McAuleyCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Wei-Ju ChangCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Nahian ChowdhuryCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Rocco CavaleriSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia r.cavaleri@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9499-1703

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKnee osteoarthritis (OA) represents a leading cause of disability globally. Exercise has been demonstrated to improve pain and function in people with knee OA. However, when in pain, commencement of exercise is difficult, and clinical effects with such interventions are often modest. Recently, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, has been shown to bolster the pain-relieving effect of exercise in experimental settings. While promising, the utility of employing this approach beyond the research environment is yet to be elucidated. Therefore, this pilot study aims to investigate the feasibility, safety, adherence, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of tDCS and exercise in home-based settings to improve pain and function in people with knee OA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is for a pilot randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial. 24 individuals with idiopathic knee OA will be randomised to receive either active tDCS+exercise (Intervention) or sham tDCS+exercise (Control) at home. Participants will receive 20 min of tDCS 5 days per week for the first 2 weeks of this 8-week trial. Participants in both groups will complete a lower limb strengthening programme 3 days per week for the entire 8 weeks. Outcome measures of feasibility (acceptability, satisfaction, retention), safety, adherence and tolerability will be assessed throughout the trial period, with clinical outcomes of pain and function assessed before and following the intervention. Feasibility, safety, adherence and tolerability outcomes will be explored descriptively using frequencies and percentages. To examine preliminary efficacy, within-group and between-group changes in pain and functional measures will be analysed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol obtained ethical approval from the Queensland University of Technology Human Research Ethics Committee (HREA 2024-8302-20200). All participants will provide written informed consent. The findings of the study will be disseminated via journal publications and international conference proceedings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12624000397516p.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyOsteoarthritis, KneeTranscranial Direct Current StimulationDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMusculoskeletal disordersPAIN MANAGEMENTREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID39542463
PMCPMC11575249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.