Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2024
[Changes in hypertensive control 2020-2021 in a family medicine unit].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Comments on the article "Changes in hypertensive control 2020-2021 in a family medicine unit"].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High blood pressure causes 9.4 million deaths worldwide annually (12.8% of total mortality). With the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures, the patterns of care for these patients changed. Objective: To evaluate the changes in hypertensive control of patients treated at UMF 18 of Tabasco before and after the appearance of COVID-19. Material and methods: Retrospective longitudinal observational study that included a random sample of 326 patients. Hypertensive control was evaluated in accordance with the current Clinical Practice Guideline. Information was collected on blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and glycated hemoglobin for diabetics, as well as other clinical variables and sociodemographic information. The proportion of patients who remained in hypertensive control, worsened or never remained in control was compared between the two periods. Associated factors were identified through multinomial regression analysis. Results: Before the pandemic, in 2020, 79.1% of patients had blood pressure levels under control, by 2021 it dropped to 50%. T2 diabetes comorbidity was the most important risk factor for lack of control, which after the appearance of COVID-19 almost doubled its effect. Conclusions: A decrease of 29.1% was recorded in compliance with hypertensive control. Groups with greater difficulty in achieving therapeutic goals were identified, highlighting the economically active population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.