Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39541861›Full record

ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2024

Exploring the effectiveness of instruction tuning in biomedical language processing.

Omid Rohanian, Mohammadmahdi Nouriborji, Samaneh Kouchaki, Farhad Nooralahzadeh, Lei Clifton, David A Clifton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Do LLMs Surpass Encoders for Biomedical NER?Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2025
    Article
  6. BioMistral-NLU: Towards More Generalizable Medical Language Understanding through Instruction Tuning.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  7. Large Language Models Struggle in Token-Level Clinical Named Entity Recognition.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omid RohanianDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NLPie Research, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: omid.rohanian@eng.ox.ac.uk.
Mohammadmahdi NouriborjiNLPie Research, Oxford, UK; Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Samaneh KouchakiDept. Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Farhad NooralahzadehUniversity of Zürich and University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Lei CliftonNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David A CliftonDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford-Suzhou Centre for Advanced Research, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly those similar to ChatGPT, have significantly influenced the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP). While these models excel in general language tasks, their performance in domain-specific downstream tasks such as biomedical and clinical Named Entity Recognition (NER), Relation Extraction (RE), and Medical Natural Language Inference (NLI) is still evolving. In this context, our study investigates the potential of instruction tuning for biomedical language processing, applying this technique to two general LLMs of substantial scale. We present a comprehensive, instruction-based model trained on a dataset that consists of approximately 200,000 instruction-focused samples. This dataset represents a carefully curated compilation of existing data, meticulously adapted and reformatted to align with the specific requirements of our instruction-based tasks. This initiative represents an important step in utilising such models to achieve results on par with specialised encoder-only models like BioBERT and BioClinicalBERT for various classical biomedical NLP tasks. Our work includes an analysis of the dataset's composition and its impact on model performance, providing insights into the intricacies of instruction tuning. By sharing our codes, models, and the distinctively assembled instruction-based dataset, we seek to encourage ongoing research and development in this area.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingBiomedical NLPInstruction tuningLlama2-MedTunedMedical NLINamed entity recognitionRelation extraction

Identifiers

PMID39541861
PMCPMC12040708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.