Article in American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Erika L SabbathErika L. Sabbath is with the Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA. Meg Lovejoy is with the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Daniel K. Schneider is with the Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Yaminette Diaz-Linhart and Grace DeHorn are with the Institute for Work and Employment Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Susan E. Peters is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-7866-7812
Meg LovejoyErika L. Sabbath is with the Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA. Meg Lovejoy is with the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Daniel K. Schneider is with the Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Yaminette Diaz-Linhart and Grace DeHorn are with the Institute for Work and Employment Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Susan E. Peters is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-6362-1520
Daniel K SchneiderErika L. Sabbath is with the Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA. Meg Lovejoy is with the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Daniel K. Schneider is with the Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Yaminette Diaz-Linhart and Grace DeHorn are with the Institute for Work and Employment Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Susan E. Peters is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-6786-0302
Yaminette Diaz-LinhartErika L. Sabbath is with the Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA. Meg Lovejoy is with the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Daniel K. Schneider is with the Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Yaminette Diaz-Linhart and Grace DeHorn are with the Institute for Work and Employment Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Susan E. Peters is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-1380-713X
Grace DeHornErika L. Sabbath is with the Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA. Meg Lovejoy is with the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Daniel K. Schneider is with the Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Yaminette Diaz-Linhart and Grace DeHorn are with the Institute for Work and Employment Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Susan E. Peters is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.ORCID 0009-0006-6690-5736
Susan E PetersErika L. Sabbath is with the Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA. Meg Lovejoy is with the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Daniel K. Schneider is with the Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Yaminette Diaz-Linhart and Grace DeHorn are with the Institute for Work and Employment Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Susan E. Peters is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-2705-643X
Funding
The Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Center for Work, Health and WellbeingU19OH008861 · OH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2007 to 2025
$23.9M
Effects of Job Quality in the Service Sector on Health-Related Outcomes Across the Life CourseR01AG066898 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HARKNETT, KRISTEN SUE, SCHNEIDER, DANNY · 2021 to 2025
Without perspectives of low-wage workers in studies of worker health and well-being, researchers cannot comprehensively assess occupational health and health equity impacts of workplace exposures and interventions. Researchers and practitioners have noted particular challenges in engaging low-wage workers in worksite-based health survey research, yet little scholarship has described strategies for improving their engagement and response rates. To fill this gap, we present case examples from 5 occupational studies conducted between 2020 and 2024 in industries including health care, food service, and fulfillment centers. For each case, we describe how we identified barriers to worker engagement in surveys, explain specific strategies we used to address those barriers, and assess the effectiveness of these actions. Then, summarizing across case examples, we offer practical recommendations to researchers surveying low-wage populations, highlighting that high-touch recruitment, building trust with workers and managers, and obtaining manager support to take surveys during work time (for worksite-based studies) are critical for obtaining reliable, representative data. Our work contributes to broader discussions on improving survey response rates in vulnerable worker populations and aims to support future researchers undertaking similar efforts. (
Indexed as
Occupational HealthHealth SurveysHumansPovertySalaries and Fringe BenefitsWorkplace
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Engaging Low-Wage Workers in Health and Well-Being Survey Research: Strategies From 5 Occupational Studies. · full record | OpenQuestion