Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39541397›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Carbapenemase-producing bacteria recovered from Nairobi River, Kenya surface water and from nearby anthropogenic and zoonotic sources.

Rael J Too, Samuel M Kariuki, George C Gitao, Lilly C Bebora, Dixie F Mollenkopf, Thomas E Wittum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Surveillance of CTX-M group 1-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rael J TooCentre for Microbiology (KEMRI-CMR), Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-6100-9090
Samuel M KariukiCentre for Microbiology (KEMRI-CMR), Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
George C GitaoThe University of Nairobi, Department of Veterinary, Pathology, Microbiology and Parasitology (UoN-Kenya).
Lilly C BeboraThe University of Nairobi, Department of Veterinary, Pathology, Microbiology and Parasitology (UoN-Kenya).
Dixie F MollenkopfThe Ohio State University, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine (OSU-VPM, OH, USA).ORCID 0000-0002-9216-1308
Thomas E WittumThe Ohio State University, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine (OSU-VPM, OH, USA).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant bacteria (CRB) present a significant global public health concern. Sub-Saharan Africa has borne a heavy burden of CRB with a reported prevalence of up to 60% in some patient populations. es in Africa focus on clinical CRB isolates, with limited data on their spread in the natural environment. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to report the recovery of CRB from Nairobi River surface waters and nearby anthropogenic and zoonotic sources in Nairobi County, Kenya. A total of 336 CRB were recovered from 336 (250 mL) samples, with 230 of the samples (68.5%) producing one or more CRB isolates. CRB were recovered most commonly from untreated sewage influent (100% of 36 samples; 79 total isolates), treated effluent (93% of 118 samples; 116 total isolates), Nairobi River surface waters upstream (100% of 36 samples; 57 total isolates), downstream (100% of 36 samples; 45 total isolates), and way downstream from the wastewater treatment plant (73% of 11 samples; 19 total isolates), slaughterhouse effluent discharges 1.5%, (5/336), animal contact areas 0.9%, (3/336), a manhole sewer from the affluent neighborhood of Karen at 2.7%, (9/336) respectively. The CRB included Escherichia coli (158, 47%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (74, 22%), and Enterobacter spp (43, 13%). Aeromonas spp (29, 9%) Acinetobacter baumannii (12, 3.6%), Citrobacter freundii (7, 2.1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5, 1.5%) and other species (8, 2.4%). CRB genotypes included blaNDM (246, 73.2%), blaKPC (40, 12%), blaVIM (51, 15.2%), blaOXA-48-like (65, 19.3%), blaIMP (15, 4.5%), and blaGES (7, 2.1%). Sixty-nine of the CRB isolates (20.5%) harbored multiple carbapenemase-encoding genes. Our results indicate that clinically important CRB are commonly present in Nairobi River surface water and from nearby wastewater and livestock sources. These pose an important public health threat that requires urgent intervention strategies and additional investigation.

Indexed as

Bacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesRiversAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsHumansKenyaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSewageWastewaterWater MicrobiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenemsSewageWastewater

Identifiers

PMID39541397
PMCPMC11563437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.