Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39541318›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Urban tick exposure on Staten Island is higher in pet owners.

Noriko Tamari, Kacey C Ernst, Aaron J Enriquez, Maria A Diuk-Wasser, Maria P Fernandez, Kevin Berry, Mary H Hayden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Noriko TamariDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1793-5983
Kacey C ErnstDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Aaron J EnriquezU.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0305-4333
Maria A Diuk-WasserDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8809-3050
Maria P FernandezPaul G. Allen School for Global Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8645-2267
Kevin BerryDepartment of Economics, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.
Mary H HaydenLyda Hill Institute for Human Resilience, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States of America.

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, Lyme and other tick-borne diseases have expanded into urban areas, including Staten Island, New York. While Lyme disease is often researched with a focus on human risk, domestic pets are also at risk of contracting the disease. The present study aims to describe differences in tick exposure, knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) between pet owners and non-owners, and to understand preventive strategies practiced by pet owners for themselves and their pets. We conducted KAP surveys via phone in 2020 and via face-to-face interviews in 2021, and we analyzed unique responses from 364 households on Staten Island. Pet owners were more likely to have ever found a tick on themselves or their household members (63%) than non-owners (46%) (p<0.001). Among pet owners, those who owned dogs (dog-only or both dog and cat owners) were more likely to have ever found a tick on their pets than cat-only owners (p<0.001). Compared with non-pet owners, pet owners were more likely both to know that ticks transmit Lyme disease (p<0.001) and to avoid gardening to reduce their tick exposure (p = 0.032), but they were less likely to wear protective clothing or adjust clothing (p = 0.013). Compared with cat owners who had never found a tick on their cats, cat owners who had ever found a tick on their cats were more likely to let their cats go outside (p<0.001). However, reported preventive measures on cats did not differ between pet owners who did and did not report tick exposure. The results indicate that encouraging pet owners to engage in preventative measures, both to protect themselves and their pets, is a potential avenue for healthcare providers and veterinarians to reduce risks from ticks.

Indexed as

PetsTicksAdultAgedAnimalsCatsDogsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLyme DiseaseMaleMiddle AgedNew YorkOwnershipSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39541318
PMCPMC11563360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.