ArticlePLOS digital health2024
Leveraging explainable artificial intelligence for early prediction of bloodstream infections using historical electronic health records.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigation, Adoption, and Use of Digital Health Technologies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Self-Management: Focus Group Study of Patient Experience and Decision-Making.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Exploring opportunities to improve health equity with machine learning and artificial intelligence in healthcare epidemiology.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Review
- From Narrative to Navigation-A Translational Roadmap for AI-enabled Early Sepsis Prediction: Comment on Shanmugam et al.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in hospital infection prevention: an integrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a severe public health threat due to their rapid progression into critical conditions like sepsis. This study presents a novel eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) framework to predict BSIs using historical electronic health records (EHRs). Leveraging a dataset from St. Olavs Hospital in Trondheim, Norway, encompassing 35,591 patients, the framework integrates demographic, laboratory, and comprehensive medical history data to classify patients into high-risk and low-risk BSI groups. By avoiding reliance on real-time clinical data, our model allows for enhanced scalability across various healthcare settings, including resource-limited environments. The XAI framework significantly outperformed traditional models, particularly with tree-based algorithms, demonstrating superior specificity and sensitivity in BSI prediction. This approach promises to optimize resource allocation and potentially reduce healthcare costs while providing interpretability for clinical decision-making, making it a valuable tool in hospital systems for early intervention and improved patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.