ArticlePloS one2024
Examining heterogeneity in dementia using data-driven unsupervised clustering of cognitive profiles.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-driven subtyping of Alzheimer's emergency presentations using unsupervised machine learning.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Detecting multimorbidity patterns in Alzheimer's disease using unsupervised machine learning: A nationwide emergency department study (2007-2022).Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Can Frontal Assessment Battery Discriminate between Patients with Alzheimer's and Frontotemporal Dementia?Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025Article
- Unsupervised clustering based on a graph attention network reveals high-risk subgroups among ICU dementia patients for enhanced mortality prediction.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dementia is characterized by a decline in memory and thinking that is significant enough to impair function in activities of daily living. Patients seen in dementia specialty clinics are highly heterogenous with a variety of different symptoms that progress at different rates. Recent research has focused on finding data-driven subtypes for revealing new insights into dementia's underlying heterogeneity, rather than assuming that the cohort is homogenous. However, current studies on dementia subtyping have the following limitations: (i) focusing on AD-related dementia only and not examining heterogeneity within dementia as a whole, (ii) using only cross-sectional baseline visit information for clustering and (iii) predominantly relying on expensive imaging biomarkers as features for clustering. In this study, we seek to overcome such limitations, using a data-driven unsupervised clustering algorithm named SillyPutty, in combination with hierarchical clustering on cognitive assessment scores to estimate subtypes within a real-world clinical dementia cohort. We use a longitudinal patient data set for our clustering analysis, instead of relying only on baseline visits, allowing us to explore the ongoing temporal relationship between subtypes and disease progression over time. Results showed that subtypes with very mild or mild dementia were more heterogenous in their cognitive profiles and risk of disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.