ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2024
[Detection of ionizing radiation in operating room and hospital areas].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The implementation of new medical techniques and technologies has increased occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and consequently the development of neoplasia and adverse effects on health personnel. Objective: Have real information on the absorbed dose by healthcare personnel exposed to ionizing radiation in an operating room. Material and methods: TLD 100 dosimeters were used to measure absorbed doses by brightness curves. 42 surgical interventions in different specialties were monitored, in each intervention a minimum of 4 dosimeters were used, with the objective of analyzing the dose based on the participation role of the individual within the operating room. Results: A database was created with the 42 monitored surgeries, for each one a minimum of 4 analyzed data were obtained (one for each participant in the surgical procedure, that is, one for each dosimeter). The highest absorbed dose was for the specialty of traumatology, followed by otorhinolaryngology, neurosurgery and finally ophthalmology. Conclusions: It was possible to use an adequate monitoring system to measure the dose of absorbed ionizing radiation during different surgical procedures. Based on the results, constant dosimetry follow-up monitoring of trauma specialty personnel is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.