ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Deciphering gene expression patterns using large-scale transcriptomic data and its applications.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Double weighted k nearest neighbours for binary classification of high dimensional genomic data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene expression varies stochastically across genders, racial groups, and health statuses. Deciphering these patterns is crucial for identifying informative genes, classifying samples, and understanding diseases like cancer. This study analyzes 11,252 bulk RNA-seq samples to explore expression patterns of 19,156 genes, including 10,512 cancer tissue samples and 740 normal samples. Additionally, 4,884 single-cell RNA-seq samples are examined. Statistical analysis using 16 probability distributions shows that normal samples display a wider range of distributions compared to cancer samples. Cancer samples tend to favor asymmetric distributions such as generalized extreme value, logarithmic normal, and Gaussian mixture distributions. In contrast, certain genes in normal samples exhibit symmetric distributions. Remarkably, more than 95.5% of genes exhibit non-normal distributions, which challenges traditional assumptions. Furthermore, distributions differ significantly between bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data. Many cancer driver genes exhibit distinct distribution patterns across sample types, suggesting potential for gene selection and classification based on distribution characteristics. A novel skewness-based metric is proposed to quantify distribution variation across datasets, showing genes with significant skewness differences have biological relevance. Finally, an improved naïve Bayes method incorporating gene-specific distributions demonstrates superior performance in simulations over traditional methods. This work enhances understanding of gene expression and its application in omics-based gene selection and sample classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.