Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39541089›Full record

ReviewJournal of muscle research and cell motility2025

Muscle spindle receptors and their impact on Parkinson´s disease and Cerebral Palsy subjects.

Else Marie Bartels, Adrian Harrison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Else Marie BartelsDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9302-9678
Adrian HarrisonPAS, Section for Physiology, Department for Veterinary and Animal Sciences (IVH), Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 100, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark. adh@sund.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-6495-5629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In some neurological conditions, like Parkinson's disease (PD) and Cerebral Palsy (CP), as well as with ageing, muscle spindles have been mentioned as participating in the pathological response of observed muscles. The aim of this review has therefore been to examine what is known about muscle spindle receptors, their function and how they are involved in regulating precise muscle movement in relation to these two conditions. Data from acoustic myography (AMG) studies with healthy controls (HC), CP and PD subjects have been re-examined with a view to identifying possible effects of changes in muscle movement which could be related to muscle spindle receptor function. Studies of muscle spindles have shown that during shortening and lengthening contractions the fusimotor system is activated differently with different discharge frequencies and sensitivities. With increasing age comes a loss of precise proprioception, something that coincides with a change in the AMG E-score towards lower values, indicating a reduced level of coordination and efficiency of muscle use. With PD and CP there is likewise a documented decrease in proprioception, also showing lower E-values than age-matched HC subjects. We conclude that the decrease in proprioception observed in these subjects must be partly due to a change in the muscle spindle / C-centre feedback system.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyMuscle SpindlesParkinson DiseaseHumansProprioceptionCerebral PalsyMechanoreceptorsMuscle spindlesMuscle tonusParkinson´s diseaseStretch receptors, muscle

Identifiers

PMID39541089
PMCPMC11865145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.