ReviewMaxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery2024
Virtual surgical plan with custom surgical guide for orthognathic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Accuracy and stability of virtual surgical planning for maxillary advancement in patients with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Patient-specific guides and osteosynthesis versus CAD/CAM occlusal splints in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy, operative time, and complications.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Biomechanical Evaluation of Patient-Specific Titanium Fixation Systems for Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy: A Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Challenges of Patient-Specific Osteotomy Guides in Anterior Maxillary Osteotomy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Patient-specific implants are more stable than conventional miniplates in Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with clefts.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- A Novel Instrument-based Technique to Identify the Mandibular Foramen during Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- The Evolution and Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Orthognathic Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Article
- Fully Digital vs. Conventional Planning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: Effects on 3D Accuracy and Surgical Efficiency.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery for Facial Asymmetry with Near-Normal Sagittal Relationship: Mid-Term Stability and Remodeling.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) in Orthognathic Surgery for Non-Syndromic Cleft Patients: A Scoping Review of Trends and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical and perioperative outcomes of computer-guided versus conventional plan-transfer workflows in orthognathic surgery for skeletal anterior open bite: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Overcoming the Limitations of Conventional Orthognathic Surgery: A Novel Approach Using Implate.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The new face of oral and maxillofacial surgery: artificial intelligence's expanding role.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Fully Guided and Free-Hand Orthognathic Surgery: Advancements, Precision, and Clinical Outcomes.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Efficiency and Applicability of Virtual Surgical Planning in Maxillofacial and Mandibular Bone Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Surgical Guides in Orthodontics: The Present and the Future.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Maxillomandibular Advancement with the Use of Virtual Surgical Planning and the CAD/CAM Technology in OSA Surgery: Volumetric Analysis of the Posterior Airway Space.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Surgery-First Approach: Harnessing Deep Learning for Enhanced Condylar Reshaping Analysis: A Retrospective Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sphenoid sinus hyperpneumatization: anatomical variants, molecular blueprints, and AI-augmented roadmaps for skull base surgery.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe shift from traditional two-dimensional (2D) planning to three-dimensional (3D) virtual surgical planning (VSP) has revolutionized orthognathic surgery, offering new levels of precision and control. VSP, combined with computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology, enables the creation of patient-specific surgical guides and implants that translate preoperative plans into more precise surgical outcomes. This review examines the comparative accuracy and operative efficiency of VSP, especially when used with custom surgical guides, against conventional 2D planning in orthognathic surgery. MAIN TEXT: The study systematically reviewed and analyzed published literature comparing the accuracy and operative time between VSP and conventional planning methods. The meta-analysis included clinical trials, controlled trials, and observational studies on patients undergoing orthognathic surgery, focusing on the degree of alignment between planned and postoperative bone positions and total surgery time. Results indicate that VSP consistently reduces discrepancies between planned and actual surgical outcomes, particularly when integrated with custom surgical guides. Additionally, while VSP demonstrated potential time-saving advantages over conventional planning, these differences were not statistically significant across studies, likely due to high variability among study protocols and designs.
conclusionsVSP with custom surgical guides enhances surgical accuracy in orthognathic procedures, marking a significant advancement over traditional methods. However, the reduction in operative time was not conclusively significant, underscoring the need for further studies to evaluate time efficiency. These findings emphasize VSP's role in improving surgical precision, which holds substantial implications for future orthognathic surgical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.