ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2024
Clinicopathologic feature and treatment progress of high-grade ovarian neuroendocrine tumors.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Durable complete remission of pulmonary metastases with bevacizumab plus olaparib maintenance therapy in homologous recombination-deficient gynecologic large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Case Report: Personalized therapy in gynecological neuroendocrine neoplasm: a case of BRCA2-mutated ovarian neuroendocrine carcinoma treated with PARP-inhibitor.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Primary ovarian pulmonary-type small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma mimicking benign adnexal torsion: a diagnostic challenge.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Ovarian Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Challenges and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Integrative Genomic and Clinicopathologic Characterization of Pure Primary Ovarian Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Case Report and Molecular Insight.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-grade Ovarian neuroendocrine tumors represent a rare subset of ovarian neoplasms characterized by aggressive behavior, poor prognosis, and early metastasis. Despite their clinical significance, the management of these tumors lacks consensus due to their low incidence. This comprehensive review encompasses literature spanning from 1991 to 2024, focusing on the clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, prognostic indicators, treatment modalities, and recent advancements in the understanding of this condition. Notably, a substantial proportion of affected individuals present during the perimenopausal period with unilateral lesions displaying mixed histological components. Biomarkers such as CA125, CA199, and NSE hold promise for aiding in the diagnosis and screening of ovarian neuroendocrine tumors. Unfortunately, patients exhibit a dismal prognosis even diagnosed at an early stage. Primary treatment strategies predominantly involve surgical intervention coupled with etoposide-cisplatin combination chemotherapy. In cases of recurrence, second-line chemotherapeutic agents including paclitaxel, irinotecan, and doxorubicin are commonly employed alongside localized radiotherapy. While specific genetic mutations remain elusive, emerging evidence suggests potential therapeutic effect involving mTOR inhibitors, PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, and antiangiogenic agents based on isolated case reports. The exploration of representative set of mutations will help for precise targeted therapies and remains a focal point of our ongoing research efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39541042What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.