ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Evaluation of dose distributions and respiratory motion tolerance for layer-stacking conformal carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a real-time multi-scenario monitoring method for respiratory motion based on capacitive sensors.Precision radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While layer-stacking irradiation provides a conformal dose distribution, it is vulnerable to respiratory motion. Considering that the motion tolerance has not yet been demonstrated, this study aimed to determine the tolerance level for the amount of target motion. Dose distributions considering motion were simulated for a numerical water phantom using in-house software. Comparisons with measured and simulated physical dose distributions confirmed the validity of the simulation, with gamma analysis showing almost 90% or greater agreement under all conditions with a criterion of 3%/3 mm. The variation in physical dose from static conditions followed a similar trend. Based on the evaluation of the simulated clinical dose uniformity, motion tolerance was derived. The acceptable motion amounts in the lateral direction were 11 mm in respiratory-ungated condition and at least 20 mm with 30% lateral gating at 4 Gy (RBE). In the longitudinal (beam upstream) direction, the acceptable target motion amounts were 3 mm without gating and 6 mm with gating. These results employed worst-case scenarios considering multiple respiratory cycles. In both lateral and longitudinal directions, the motion amounts of 3 mm for non-gating and 5 mm for gating were acceptable. The acceptable target motion amounts improved by 1-9 mm with gating and increased prescribed doses. The dose uniformity and motion tolerance under multiple conditions, although based on a simple system, may be useful for treatment involving target motion in layer-stacking irradiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.