Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540995›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2024

Snake venom toxins as potential therapeutic agents in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Jesika Ochoa-Mosquera, Alejandro Montoya-Gómez, Eliécer Jiménez-Charris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Brief history of ophidiology and ophidism in Colombia.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jesika Ochoa-MosqueraGrupo de Nutrición, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle, Calle 4B # 36-00, Edificio 116, Oficina, Cali, 5002, Colombia. Jesika.ochoa@correounivalle.edu.co.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6268-6833
Alejandro Montoya-GómezGrupo de Nutrición, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle, Calle 4B # 36-00, Edificio 116, Oficina, Cali, 5002, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0494-4207
Eliécer Jiménez-CharrisGrupo de Nutrición, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle, Calle 4B # 36-00, Edificio 116, Oficina, Cali, 5002, Colombia. eliecer.jimenez@correounivalle.edu.co.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-1521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a significant global health concern and one of the leading causes of death from diseases in men. There is a growing interest in exploring new therapeutic approaches to enhance patient treatment outcomes and quality of life. Snake venom-derived compounds have emerged as promising candidates for anticancer treatment due to their potential to be selective and reduce adverse effects. In this article, we conduct a literature review on prostate cancer and discuss the investigation of snake venoms as potential alternatives in treatments to minimize toxicity and maximize efficacy. The potential of snake venom toxins in modulating key processes such as cell apoptosis, inhibition of cell migration, and angiogenesis is highlighted. This comprehensive exploration reaffirms the importance of advancing research into snake venom-based therapies to combat prostate cancer, transform treatment paradigms, and improve the well-being of affected individuals.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsSnake VenomsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell MovementHumansMaleNeovascularization, PathologicAntineoplastic AgentsSnake VenomsAnticancer agentBioprospectingDrug discoveryProstatic carcinomaVenom molecules

Identifiers

PMID39540995
PMCPMC11564369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.