Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540993›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2025

A prospective analysis of clinical and parasitological outcomes after treatment or a wait-and-see approach of Dientamoeba fragilis infection in an adult general practice population.

Hanna M J L Hazenberg, Theo G Mank, Caterina Band, Sjoerd M Euser, Ellert J van Soest

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanna M J L HazenbergDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Theo G MankDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Public Health Laboratory Kennemerland, Boerhaavelaan 26, Haarlem, 2035 RC, The Netherlands.
Caterina BandDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd M EuserDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Public Health Laboratory Kennemerland, Boerhaavelaan 26, Haarlem, 2035 RC, The Netherlands. s.euser@streeklabhaarlem.nl.
Ellert J van SoestDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDientamoeba fragilis is a protozoan frequently encountered in stool samples globally. It is debated whether Dientamoeba fragilis carries pathogenic capacities. This study prospectively analyses clinical and parasitological outcomes after treatment or a wait-and-see approach of Dientamoeba fragilis infection in a general practice adult population.

methodsIn this prospective observational cohort study 113 adult patients with a positive Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test result for D. fragilis (T0) in a primary care setting, were followed-up longitudinally with a control PCR-test and microscopic stool examination at 30 days (T1) and 90 days (T2) after inclusion. Standardized patient-reported questionnaires including treatment details and the adjusted Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Score (IBS-SS) were retrieved at T0, T1 and T2.

resultsParasitology and questionnaires were retrieved from 87 participants at T0 and T1, and 74 at T2. Treated patients(n = 64) more often tested PCR negative at T1 (64.1% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.001) and T2 (67.3% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.001) compared to untreated patients. No difference in decline in IBS-SS was seen comparing the treatment and non-treatment groups at T1 (p = 0.403) or T2 (p = 1.00).

conclusionA short and long term increased parasitological clearance is shown with treatment of clioquinol or metronidazole compared with no treatment. A clear and significant correlation between parasitological cure and decline of clinical complaints as reported by the participants could not be established.

Indexed as

Antiprotozoal AgentsDientamoebaDientamoebiasisWatchful WaitingAdultAgedFecesFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeAntiprotozoal AgentsClinical outcomeDientamoeba fragilisPathogenicityTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.