Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540987›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2024

The development of a C5.0 machine learning model in a limited data set to predict early mortality in patients with ARDS undergoing an initial session of prone positioning.

David M Hannon, Jaffar David Abbas Syed, Bairbre McNicholas, Michael Madden, John G Laffey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David M HannonDepartment of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-2085
Jaffar David Abbas SyedDepartment of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Bairbre McNicholasDepartment of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Michael MaddenSchool of Computer Science, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
John G LaffeyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland. jlaffey@universityofgalway.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) has a high morbidity and mortality. One therapy that can decrease mortality is ventilation in the prone position (PP). Patients undergoing PP are amongst the sickest, and there is a need for early identification of patients at particularly high risk of death. These patients may benefit from an in-depth review of treatment or consideration of rescue therapies. We report the development of a machine learning model trained to predict early mortality in patients undergoing prone positioning as part of the management of their ARDS.

methodsProspectively collected clinical data were analysed retrospectively from a single tertiary ICU. The records of patients who underwent an initial session of prone positioning whilst receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were identified (n = 131). The decision to perform prone positioning was based on the criteria in the PROSEVA study. A C5.0 classifier algorithm with adaptive boosting was trained on data gathered before, during, and after initial proning. Data was split between training (85% of data) and testing (15% of data). Hyperparameter tuning was achieved through a grid-search using a maximal entropy configuration. Predictions for 7-day mortality after initial proning session were made on the training and testing data.

resultsThe model demonstrated good performance in predicting 7-day mortality (AUROC: 0.89 training, 0.78 testing). Seven variables were used for prediction. Sensitivity was 0.80 and specificity was 0.67 on the testing data set. Patients predicted to survive had 13.3% mortality, while those predicted to die had 66.67% mortality. Among patients in whom the model predicted patient would survive to day 7 based on their response, mortality at day 7 was 13.3%. Conversely, if the model predicted the patient would not survive to day 7, mortality was 66.67%.

conclusionsThis proof-of-concept study shows that with a limited data set, a C5.0 classifier can predict 7-day mortality from a number of variables, including the response to initial proning, and identify a cohort at significantly higher risk of death. This can help identify patients failing conventional therapies who may benefit from a thorough review of their management, including consideration of rescue treatments, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This study shows the potential of a machine learning model to identify ARDS patients at high risk of early mortality following PP. This information can guide clinicians in tailoring treatment strategies and considering rescue therapies. Further validation in larger cohorts is needed.

Indexed as

ARDSCritical careMachine learningMechanical ventilationProne positioning

Identifiers

PMID39540987
PMCPMC11564488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.