Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540938›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biometeorology2025

Definition of reproductive structures in Eucalyptus for phenological data collection.

Claudia Helena Giraldo Escobar, Marie R Keatley, Sabine Kasel, Julian Di Stefano, Craig R Nitschke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biometeorology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia Helena Giraldo EscobarSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Burnley, Victoria, 3121, Australia. chgiraldoesc@student.unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-8434
Marie R KeatleySchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria, 3363, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-576X
Sabine KaselSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Burnley, Victoria, 3121, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8188-1089
Julian Di StefanoSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria, 3363, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7846-6642
Craig R NitschkeSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Burnley, Victoria, 3121, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2514-9744

Funding

BirdLife Australia BirdLife AustraliaDepartment of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, State Government of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, State Government of VictoriaFaculty of Science, University of Melbourne Faculty of Science, University of MelbourneHolsworth Wildlife Research Endowment Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an era where global climate change is shifting plant phenology, global meta-analyses of multiple species are required more than ever. Common language or references for enhanced data compatibility are key for such analyses. Although the Plant Phenology Ontology (PPO) addresses this challenge, it does not capture several relevant reproductive structures that are critical in species with long reproductive cycles, like many Eucalyptus species. We reviewed the terminology and concepts that describe reproductive structures in eucalypts and compared them with the existing classes of the PPO to explore the PPO's potential for harmonizing disparate eucalypt datasets. We identified incongruencies within and between eucalypt terminology and the PPO. We tested the sensitivity of the PPO for capturing key eucalypt phenological structures and found it sensitive to classification of certain structures. To address these limitations, we developed the Eucalyptus Phenology Ontology (EPO), a new ontology that builds on the PPO and captures key reproductive structures using a more refined classification. The EPO integrates the relationships between reproductive structures, phenological stages, and phenological traits. The vocabulary is species-neutral so it can be applied to other taxa but specifies the synonyms and descriptions required to capture the complexity of eucalypt phenology.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesEucalyptusClimate ChangeData CollectionFlowersReproductionTerminology as TopicEucalyptus baxteriFloral bud developmentFruit formationHerbarium recordsPlant reproductive phenology

Identifiers

PMID39540938
PMCPMC12540636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.