Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540910›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

Development and validation of a cost-effective DIY simulation model for McDonald cerclage training.

Johanna Buechel, Adam Kalisz, Saskia-Laureen Herbert, Anne Scherer-Quenzer, Bettina Blau-Schneider, Teresa Starrach, Katrina Kraft, Achim Wöckel, Ulrich Pecks, Matthias Kiesel

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Johanna BuechelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Buechel_j@ukw.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9318-7182
Adam KaliszDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Communication Engineering, Information Technology (LIKE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Saskia-Laureen HerbertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Anne Scherer-QuenzerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Bettina Blau-SchneiderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Teresa StarrachDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katrina KraftUniversity Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital St. Hedwig of the Order of St. John, Regensburg, Germany.
Achim WöckelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Ulrich PecksMaternal Health and Midwifery, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany.
Matthias KieselDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe prevention of preterm birth is a challenging task for obstetricians. Cervical cerclage, used as both a primary and secondary prevention method for spontaneous preterm birth, is a crucial surgical intervention. It is essential that obstetricians can learn this procedure in a simulated environment before performing the stitches on high-risk patients. This study aimed to develop a simulator based on 3D printing and evaluate its validity for clinical training.

methodsThe objectives of this study were (1) to design and construct a cost-effective simulator for McDonald cerclage with two different cervix models-a closed cervix and a cervix with bulging membranes-using common material from a DIY store and 3D printing technology and (2) to validate its effectiveness through feedback from learners and experts in cervical cerclage. The self-made simulator was evaluated by obstetricians using a questionnaire with Likert scale.

resultsObstetricians and gynecologists assessed the simulator and found it useful for learning and practicing cervical cerclage. The simulator was deemed valuable for skill training.

conclusionCervical cerclage is a complex procedure that should be mastered through simulation rather than initial practice on real patients. Our simulator is a cost-effective model suitable for various clinical settings. It has been validated by obstetricians for both preventive and therapeutic cerclage, demonstrating its efficacy for training in cerclage techniques. Future research should focus on less skilled obstetricians and gynecologists and investigate how repeated use of the simulator can enhance their performance in cerclage stitching.

Indexed as

Cerclage, CervicalModels, AnatomicObstetricsPremature BirthSimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGynecologyHumansPregnancyPrinting, Three-DimensionalCervical stitchHigh-risk pregnancyPreterm birthSkills trainingSurgical training

Identifiers

PMID39540910
PMCPMC11985586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.