SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2025
Evaluating the clinical potential of bioceramic-rods for revascularization in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review.
Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the safety, reliability, and effectiveness of bioceramic rods (BR) in treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), compared with other treatments such as core decompression and autologous bone grafting.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed, Embase, and CNKI databases from January 2011 to July 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Included studies involved patients treated with bioceramic rods. Studies were required to have a follow-up time of more than six months and no statistically significant differences in baseline information between groups in controlled studies. Exclusions included literature reviews, case reports, conference abstracts, animal experiments, and studies without defined success criteria or lacking analysis on factors influencing efficacy.
main outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was the Harris Hip Score (HHS) improvement rate. Secondary outcomes included the femoral head stability and survival rate, alongside the hip replacement rate.
resultsThe systematic review revealed significant improvements in symptom relief and functional recovery using BR for the treatment of ONFH. An average follow-up of 20.44 months showed an overall HHS improvement rate of 33.93%. Hip preservation efficacy with BR was superior to core decompression and autologous bone grafting. The overall femoral head survival rate was 84.42%, with results sustained for three years. The success rate of hip preservation was notably higher with early intervention, which showed better outcomes when the overall HHS improvement exceeded 27%, and rates of excellent and good outcomes approached 90%.
conclusionsBioceramic rods offer a safe, minimally invasive, reliable, and effective treatment option for ONFH, ensuring substantial symptom relief and functional recovery. The technique's success in early disease stages suggests a strong potential for broader clinical adoption. Although additional benefits from combining BR with stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and traditional Chinese medicine are noted, definitive conclusions on enhanced therapeutic effects remain inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.