ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Exploring the Relationship Between Refractive Errors and Common Chronic Diseases Via Blood Biochemistry Tests: A Large Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between refraction characteristics and anthropometrics in 7- to 10-year-old Chinese primary school students.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The association between maternal blood lipid trajectory and offspring preschool myopia in prospective and nested case‒control analyses.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters and Incident Glaucoma Among Myopic Eyes.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between refractive errors and common chronic diseases using blood biochemistry tests, and to investigate the associated modifiable risk factors, with the goal of informing and developing effective preventive strategies. Methods: A total of 116,245 participants with refractometry at baseline enrolled in the UK Biobank were included in this prospective cohort study. Restricted cubic spline and Cox proportional hazards models were used to detect associations between refractive error, blood biochemistry tests, and common chronic diseases. Interaction effects on the additive scale and effect modification analysis were used to explore excess modifiable risk factors for disease prevention. Results: Spherical equivalent significantly associated with vitamin D, sex hormone binding globulin, apolipoprotein A, blood glucose, and aspartate aminotransferase levels. Subjects with myopia demonstrated a 13% higher risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) incidence compared to those without myopia (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-1.19) throughout a median follow-up of 9.12 years. Interaction analysis revealed 15% (95% CI = 9%-21%) of this risk was due to myopia-obesity interaction. However, active engagement in physical activity could potentially mitigate this risk (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.93-1.20). Conclusions: Refractive errors were associated with specific blood indicators, particularly noting the association between myopia and higher T2DM incidence in middle-aged and elderly populations. This effect interacts with obesity, and promoting physical activity among myopia individuals provides greater benefits in the prevention of T2DM compared to non-myopic individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.