ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024
MATEdb2, a Collection of High-Quality Metazoan Proteomes across the Animal Tree of Life to Speed Up Phylogenomic Studies.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- FANTASIA suite: a reproducible and configurable framework for embedding-based functional annotation of proteins.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Convergent genomic trajectories shape adaptation to life on land across animal lineages.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Genomic Exaptation and Regulatory Landscape Shifts as Key Mechanisms Enabling Flatworm Terrestrialization.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- FANTASIA leverages language models to decode the functional dark proteome across the animal tree of life.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Advances and challenges in understanding evolution through genome comparison: meeting report of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) lecture course "Evolutionary and Comparative Genomics".Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have exponentially increased the number of genomic data available for animals (Metazoa) in the last decades, with high-quality chromosome-level genomes being published almost daily. Nevertheless, generating a new genome is not an easy task due to the high cost of genome sequencing, the high complexity of assembly, and the lack of standardized protocols for genome annotation. The lack of consensus in the annotation and publication of genome files hinders research by making researchers lose time in reformatting the files for their purposes but can also reduce the quality of the genetic repertoire for an evolutionary study. Thus, the use of transcriptomes obtained using the same pipeline as a proxy for the genetic content of species remains a valuable resource that is easier to obtain, cheaper, and more comparable than genomes. In a previous study, we presented the Metazoan Assemblies from Transcriptomic Ensembles database (MATEdb), a repository of high-quality transcriptomic and genomic data for the two most diverse animal phyla, Arthropoda and Mollusca. Here, we present the newest version of MATEdb (MATEdb2) that overcomes some of the previous limitations of our database: (i) we include data from all animal phyla where public data are available, and (ii) we provide gene annotations extracted from the original GFF genome files using the same pipeline. In total, we provide proteomes inferred from high-quality transcriptomic or genomic data for almost 1,000 animal species, including the longest isoforms, all isoforms, and functional annotation based on sequence homology and protein language models, as well as the embedding representations of the sequences. We believe this new version of MATEdb will accelerate research on animal phylogenomics while saving thousands of hours of computational work in a plea for open, greener, and collaborative science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.