Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540844›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

A Phase III Randomized Trial of Integrated Genomics and Avatar Models for Personalized Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: The AVATAR Trial.

Francesca Sarno, Jair Tenorio, Sofia Perea, Laura Medina, Roberto Pazo-Cid, Ignacio Juez, Rocío Garcia-Carbonero, Jaime Feliu, Carmen Guillen-Ponce, Pedro P Lopez-Casas and 11 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Francesca Sarno *Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0100-8568
Jair Tenorio *CIBERER, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5308-2316
Sofia Perea *Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3761-2321
Laura MedinaUGCI Medical Oncology, Hospital Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8041-3547
Roberto Pazo-CidHospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8026-7391
Ignacio JuezHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6151-0862
Rocío Garcia-CarboneroHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Imas12, Facultad de Medicina UCM, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3342-397X
Jaime FeliuHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4867-1420
Carmen Guillen-PonceHospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3594-1084
Pedro P Lopez-CasasInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital 12 de octubre (imas 12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9866-7361
Carmen GuerraCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3891-046X
Yolanda DuranHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-6106-564X
José Francisco López-AcostaHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-3237-4536
Carolina AlonsoHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0001-5963-0539
Estrella EsquivelUnidad de Genómica, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4446-4961
Ana DopazoUnidad de Genómica, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4910-1684
Dipikaa AkshinthalaCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0007-5033-506X
Senthil K MuthuswamyCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6564-9634
Pablo LapunzinaCIBERER, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6324-4825
Bruno BockornyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9162-1560
Manuel HidalgoDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3765-3318

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (ERC) 670582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has limited treatment options. We compared the efficacy of comprehensive precision medicine against that of the conventional treatment in PDAC. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe report a phase III trial of advanced PDAC in which patients were randomized (1:2) to a conventional treatment treated at physician's discretion (arm A) or to precision medicine (arm B). Subjects randomized to arm B underwent a tumor biopsy for whole-exome sequencing and to generate avatar mouse models and patient-derived organoids for phenotypic drug screening, with final treatment recommended by the molecular tumor board. The primary objective was median overall survival (OS).

resultsA total of 137 patients were enrolled with 125 randomized, 44 to arm A and 81 to arm B. Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 80.3% (65/81) patients of arm B, with potentially actionable mutations detected in 21.5% (14/65). Experimental models were generated in 16/81 patients (19.8%). Second-line treatment was administered to 39 patients in the experimental arm, but only four (10.2%) received personalized treatment, whereas 35 could not receive matched therapy because of rapid clinical deterioration, delays in obtaining study results, or the absence of actionable targets. The median OS was 8.7 and 8.6 months (P = 0.849) and the median progression-free survival was 3.8 and 4.3 months (P = 0.563) for the conventional and experimental arms, respectively. Notably, the four patients who received personalized treatment had a median OS of 19.3 months.

conclusionsPersonalized medicine was challenging to implement in most patients with PDAC, limiting the interpretation of intention-to-treat analysis. Survival was improved in the subset of patients who did receive matched therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalGenomicsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAvatarExome SequencingFemaleHumansMaleMiceBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID39540844
PMCPMC11739777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.