Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540781›Full record

SynthesisCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025

CYP2D6 Phenotype and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Bias Analysis and Meta-Analysis.

Richard F MacLehose, Thomas P Ahern, Lindsay J Collin, Aixin Li, Timothy L Lash

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Combining Observational Studies to Reduce Multiple Biases.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Preventing adverse drug reactions and more: current clinical use of pharmacogenetic testing.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard F MacLehoseDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-2041-3710
Thomas P AhernDepartment of Surgery, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.ORCID 0000-0003-0440-8727
Lindsay J CollinDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-0170-2592
Aixin LiDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0006-9319-8790
Timothy L LashDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-5240-5195

Funding

Improving Reproducibility by Incorporating UncertaintyR01LM013049 · NLM · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LASH, TIMOTHY L. · 2019 to 2022
$1.1M
Identifying factors associated with ovarian cancer recurrence using a population-based approachK99CA277580 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI COLLIN, LINDSAY JANE · 2023 to 2024
$279k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA277580NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013049U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) R01LM013049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the impact of systematic bias due to loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and incomplete phenotyping in studies examining the relationship between CYP2D6 variants and breast cancer recurrence among women treated with tamoxifen.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature on tamoxifen, CYP2D6 variants, and breast cancer recurrence. A quantitative bias analysis was performed to adjust for LOH and incomplete phenotyping. Bias-adjusted results were then combined in a meta-analysis.

resultsThirty-three studies informed the bias analysis and meta-analysis on CYP2D6 variants and breast cancer recurrence and/or mortality. An unadjusted meta-analysis suggested increased risk of recurrence and/or mortality for poor relative to normal metabolizers [RR = 1.28; 95% simulation interval (SI), 1.04-1.58] with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 27%; P for heterogeneity = 0.07). Adjusting for LOH and incomplete genotyping resulted in a slight change in the effect estimate and a decrease in heterogeneity (RR = 1.34; 95% SI, 1.10-1.63; I2 = 0%; P for heterogeneity = 0.17). Intermediate metabolizers had a slightly increased risk of recurrence and/or mortality relative to normal metabolizers (RR = 1.15; 95% SI, 1.00-1.34; I2 = 0%; P for heterogeneity = 0.89).

conclusionsAdjusting for biases such as LOH and incomplete genotyping reduced observed heterogeneity between studies. Individuals with poor CYP2D6 phenotypes were at increased risk for breast cancer outcomes compared with those with normal phenotypes. IMPACT: Reduction in CYP2D6 activity was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer recurrence and/or mortality, and results underscore the importance of quantitatively adjusting for biases when aggregating study results. See related In the Spotlight, p. 221.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalFemaleHumansLoss of HeterozygosityPhenotypeAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Tamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID39540781
PMCPMC11802319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.