ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2024
Fertility Preservation in Postpubertal Males Undergoing Cancer Treatment in a Middle-Income Country: Is it Possible Despite the Barriers?
Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Increased survival rates in childhood cancer have led to an emphasis on the importance of treatment-related infertility. Fertility preservation methods should be explained to every patient and their families (PaFs) before treatment. Establishing good communication with PaFs is crucial in this regard despite many barriers such as cultural and financial barriers. Routine feasibility of sperm preservation (SP) in adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer was evaluated after the implementation of reimbursement for the procedure and storage by the national healthcare system. Materials and Methods: Males <18 years of age planned to undergo cancer treatment between 2021 and 2023 were included. Patient and their families were informed by the treating physician about the disease, treatment modality, side effects, the importance of SP, and the method. Information about the purpose and technique of SP was provided to the patient alone in a comfortable environment. Questions from PaFs were answered, and consent was obtained. The procedure and storage cost was covered by the social security institution. Results: Seventeen patients (median age 15) (15 with bone/soft tissue sarcoma, 1 brain tumor, and 1 Hodgkin lymphoma) were included. There were no refusals for SP. Eleven patients were able to provide sperm samples. Of the 6 patients who could not provide sperm, 3 stated embarrassment, 2 anxiety, and 1 cancer-related pain. Conclusion: Increasing awareness among physicians about the importance of treatment-related infertility, allocating sufficient time to inform PaFs about fertility preservation, and providing information taking into account societal or socio-cultural factors will contribute to preventing treatment-related infertility. Establishing close communication with the Reproductive Health Center (RHC), along with the rapid and cost-free nature of the procedure, enhances success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.