ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
How Sophisticated Are Neural Networks Needed to Predict Long-Term Nonadiabatic Dynamics?
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Consistent and Generalizable Effective Model Hamiltonian Framework for Studying Nonadiabatic Dynamics in the Condensed Phase.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonadiabatic dynamics is key for understanding solar energy conversion and photochemical processes in condensed phases. This often involves the non-Markovian dynamics of the reduced density matrix in open quantum systems, where knowledge of the system's prior states is necessary to predict its future behavior. In this study, we explore time-series machine learning methods for predicting long-time nonadiabatic dynamics based on short-time input data, comparing these methods with the physics-based transfer tensor method (TTM). To understand the impact of memory time on these approaches, we demonstrate that non-Markovian dynamics can be represented as a linear map within the Nakajima-Zwanzig generalized quantum master equation framework. We further propose a practical method to estimate the effective memory time, within a given tolerance, for reduced density matrix propagation. Our predictive models are applied to various physical systems, including spin-boson models, multistate harmonic (MSH) models with Ohmic spectral densities and for a realistic organic photovoltaic system composed of a carotenoid-porphyrin-fullerene triad dissolved in tetrahydrofuran. Results indicate that the simple linear-mapping fully connected neural network (FCN) outperforms the more complicated nonlinear-mapping networks including the gated recurrent unit (GRU) and the convolutional neural network/long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) in systems with short memory times, such as spin-boson and MSH models. Conversely, the nonlinear CNN-LSTM and GRU models yield higher accuracy in the triad MSH systems characterized by long memory times. These findings offer valuable insights into the role of effective memory time in non-Markovian quantum dynamics, providing practical guidance for the application of time-series machine learning models to complex chemical systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.