Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540662›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

Patient-Generated Data as Interventions in Doctor-Patient Relationships? Negotiating (Un)Invited Participation in Medical Consultations.

Ann Kristin Augst, Danny Lämmerhirt, Cornelius Schubert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ann Kristin AugstDepartment of Social Sciences, TU Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2718-5776
Danny LämmerhirtWaag Futurelab, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3233-2750
Cornelius SchubertDepartment of Social Sciences, TU Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2861-4007

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Project-ID: 438577023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health data generated by apps and devices are increasingly popular and expected to affect various aspects of doctor-patient relationships. No longer confined to medically authorised and certified health technologies, a range of biomedical data-from heart rate to blood pressure or oxygen saturation-are captured and processed by consumer health devices. This article outlines different responses of physicians to patients collecting data with popular consumer devices and considers how the data may challenge or reify medical authority. Based on semi-structured interviews with doctors and chronically ill patients in Germany from 2021 to 2023, we compare cases from diabetes, sleep disorders, cardiovascular conditions, obesity and ME/CFS and explore when, how and for what reasons different medical specialists consider patient-generated data (PGD) from consumer devices in outpatient settings. Their response registers vary: whereas some physicians reject PGD that seem to compete with their diagnostic activities, others tolerate the data (collection), whereas still others more readily include them into their diagnostic practices. This suggests nuanced strategies for navigating the demarcation between accepting or rejecting 'uninvited' participation through PGD from consumer apps and devices.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansQualitative Researchdigital healthcaredoctor‐patient relationshipmedical authoritypatient‐generated datauninvited participation

Identifiers

PMID39540662
PMCPMC11851048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.