Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540265›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2025

Defining neonatal status epilepticus: A scoping review from the ILAE neonatal task force.

Magda L Nunes, Elissa G Yozawitz, Courtney J Wusthoff, Renée A Shellhaas, Efraín Olivas-Peña, Jo M Wilmshurst, Ronit M Pressler, Chahnez C Triki, Hans Hartmann, Terrie Inder and 5 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rethinking the definition of neonatal status epilepticus.European journal of pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Status epilepticus in the neonate.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Magda L NunesSchool of Medicine and Brain Institute (BraIns), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3402-6810
Elissa G YozawitzIsabelle Rapin Division of Child Neurology of the Saul R Korey Department of Neurology and Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8230-8364
Courtney J WusthoffDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1882-5567
Renée A ShellhaasDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3175-3908
Efraín Olivas-PeñaDepartment of Neurosciences, National Institute of Perinatology, Mexico City, Mexico. Department of Pediatrics, Women's Hospital, Yautepec Morelos, Mexico.
Jo M WilmshurstDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7328-1796
Ronit M PresslerClinical Neuroscience, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2905-6839
Chahnez C TrikiChild Neurology Department, Hedi Chaker Hospital, LR19ES15, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-2918-3819
Hans HartmannDepartment of Pediatric Kidney, Liver, Metabolic and Neurological Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Terrie InderDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine; Director, Center for Newborn Research, Children's Hospital of Orange County, California, USA.
Geraldine B BoylanINFANT Research Centre and Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0920-5291
Kette ValenteDepartment of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Research Center for Complex and Rare Epilepsies, Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5008-0809
Solomon L MosheLaboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology and LIM 21, Department of Psychiatry, Clinics Hospital, University of São Paulo (HC FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9427-9476
Eli M MizrahiDepartment of Neurology and Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Nicholas S AbendDepartment of Neurology and Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6166-2663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the available literature concerning the definition of neonatal status epilepticus (SE) and/or seizure burden.

methodsThe International League Against Epilepsy Neonatal Task Force performed a scoping review of the definitions of neonatal SE. Following a systematic literature review, articles were screened and data were abstracted regarding: (1) article characteristics (author identification, publication year, journal name, digital object identifier, title, objective, and study design); (2) cohort characteristics (sample size, gestational age, seizure etiology); (3) definition of SE and/or seizure burden; and (4) the method used to identify and classify SE, including routine EEG (EEG), continuous EEG monitoring (cEEG), amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG), or clinical features.

resultsThe scoping review yielded 44 articles containing a definition of neonatal SE. Studies mainly included infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy or neonates considered at risk for seizures. SE identification and classification most often relied on cEEG. The majority of studies based the definition of SE on seizure duration, including summed duration of seizures comprising ≥50% of any 1-h epoch, recurrent seizures for >50% of the total recording time, or either electrographic seizures lasting >30 min and/or repeated electrographic seizures totaling >50% in any 1-h period. Seizure burden was reported in 20 studies, and the most commonly used approach assessed total seizure burden, defined as total duration of EEG seizures in minutes. Sixteen studies assessed the relationship between seizure burden and outcomes, and most identified a significant association between higher seizure burden and unfavorable outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: This scoping review demonstrates a substantial variation in neonatal SE definitions across the literature. The most common definitions were based around a 30-min seizure duration criterion, but evidence was insufficient to support that 30 min was a cutoff defining prolonged seizures or that seizures exceeding this burden were more likely to be pharmacoresistant or associated with worse outcomes. As a next step, the Neonatal Task Force intends to develop a standardized approach to assessing and describing neonatal seizure burden and defining neonatal SE. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Prolonged seizures are a neurologic emergency, if untreated, can lead to permanent injury or death. In adults and children, seizures lasting longer than 30 min are believed to cause brain damage. However, it is not clear if this definition can be applied to neonates. The International League Against Epilepsy Neonatal Taskforce performed a scoping literature review which identified 44 articles containing a definition of neonatal status epilepticus. In this article, the authors reviewed the current used definitions for prolonged seizures in neonates to establish a relationship between seizure duration and neurological outcome. As a next step, the Neonatal Task Force intends to develop a standardized approach to assessing and describing neonatal seizure burden and defining neonatal SE.

Indexed as

Status EpilepticusAdvisory CommitteesElectroencephalographyHumansInfant, NewbornSeizuresneonatalneurocritical careoutcomeseizure burdenseizuresstatus epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID39540265
PMCPMC11803272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.