Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540227›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2025

Loncastuximab in high-risk and heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a realworld analysis from 21 US centers.

Viktoriya Zelikson, Ashwath Gurumurthi, Yazeed Sawalha, Kaitlin Annunzio, Aditi Saha, Ning Dong, David Qualls, Behzad Amoozgar, Brad Kahl, John Baird and 29 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Selecting the best treatment approach and optimizing sequencing strategies in large B-cell lymphoma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Viktoriya ZeliksonUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville.
Ashwath GurumurthiMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Yazeed SawalhaThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus.
Kaitlin AnnunzioThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus.
Aditi SahaMoffit Cancer Center, Tampa.
Ning DongMoffit Cancer Center, Tampa.
David QuallsDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
Behzad AmoozgarSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University of St Louis, St. Louis.
Brad KahlSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University of St Louis, St. Louis.
John BairdCity of Hope Cancer Center, Los Angeles.
Pavan ChallaYale University, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven.
Scott F HuntingtonYale University, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.
Jennifer SantosUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver.
Steven BairUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver.
Mayur NarkhedeUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham.
Shuning LiFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia.
Zachary FroschFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia.
Carrie HoFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle.
Stephen D SmithFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle.
Allison WinterCleveland Clinic Cancer Center, Cleveland.
Daniel LandsburgAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Fateeha FurqanMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Mehdi HamadaniMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Katelin BairdWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta.
Jason RomancikWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta.
Hanan AlharthyUniversity of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore.
Jennie LawUniversity of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore.
Leyla BojaniniStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford.
Ranjana AdvaniStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford.
Boyu HuHunstman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Patrick Connor JohnsonMass General Cancer Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Natalie S GroverLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Mwanasha MerrilDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
Jennifer L CrombieDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
Nazila ShafagatiSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
Cole SterlingSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
Loretta J NastoupilMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Narendranath EpperlaThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus.
Emily C AyersUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, GA. eca2t@uvahealth.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are poor. Loncastuximab- teserine (Lonca) is an antibody-drug conjugate which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL who have received at least two prior lines of therapy, based on the results of the LOTIS-2 trial. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy in the real-world setting. This retrospective study included 21 US centers and evaluated outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with Lonca. Our analysis comprises 187 patients with notably higher-risk baseline features compared to those of the LOTIS-2 population, including a higher proportion of patients with bulky disease (17% vs. 0%), high-grade B-cell histology (22% vs. 8%), and increased number of prior lines of therapy (median 4 vs. 3). The complete response rate was 14% and overall response rate was 32%. The median event-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Those with bulky disease and high-grade B-cell histology had significantly worse outcomes, and those with non-germinal center cell of origin and a complete response to the most recent line of therapy demonstrated superior outcomes. In summary, in this largest retrospective cohort study of Lonca in the real-world setting, the response rates, event-free survival and overall survival were lower than those reported in LOTIS-2, which is likely reflective of its use in higher risk and more heavily pre-treated patients in the real world compared to the patients enrolled on a clinical study.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmunoconjugatesLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBenzodiazepinesDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBenzodiazepinesImmunoconjugatesloncastuximab tesirine

Identifiers

PMID39540227
PMCPMC11873705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.