Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540220›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of dermatology2025

Wound closure techniques after wide excision for hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Corina Ioana Cucu, Irina Ciobotariu, Andrea Paradisi, Lucia Di Nardo, Barbara Fossati, Maria Mannino, Dalma Malvaso, Andrea Chiricozzi, Ketty Peris

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Corina Ioana Cucu *Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Irina Ciobotariu *Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7198-4273
Andrea ParadisiDermatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5863-8347
Lucia Di NardoDermatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2087-7526
Barbara FossatiDermatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Maria ManninoDermatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Dalma MalvasoUOC di Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea ChiricozziDermatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-0387
Ketty PerisDermatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-6600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects intertriginous skin areas, clinically characterized by recurrent inflamed nodules, abscesses, sinus tracts, and severe scars. Systemic treatments may provide temporary relief, while wide surgical excision offers prolonged disease-free periods. We evaluated the most efficient wound closure methods following wide excision of HS lesions in terms of recurrence, functionality, and quality of life. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov, adhering to the PRISMA 2020 criteria. We included original studies published until February 2024, focusing on wound closure methods post-wide excision for HS. Data from 121 papers were analyzed using network and direct meta-analysis methods to compare recurrence and postoperative complication rates. From 1181 articles, 121 were included in the meta-analysis after removing duplicates and excluding publications that did not meet the inclusion criteria. Recurrence rates were associated with the type of reconstruction technique as follows: primary closure, 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20-30%); skin grafts, 18% (95% CI, 14-22%), and flaps, 12% (95% CI, 9-15%). Secondary intention healing showed a recurrence rate of 28% (95% CI, 23-33%). Flaps were associated with the lowest recurrence rates compared to other surgery techniques.

Indexed as

Dermatologic Surgical ProceduresHidradenitis SuppurativaPostoperative ComplicationsWound Closure TechniquesHumansQuality of LifeRecurrenceSkin TransplantationSurgical FlapsWound Healingacne inversaflapgrafthidradenitis suppurativalocal excisionmeta‐analysisprimary closurereconstructionrecurrencesecondary closuresecondary intention healingsplit skin graftsurgerysystematic reviewwide excisionwound closure technique

Identifiers

PMID39540220
PMCPMC11931091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.