ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
A Clinical Retrospective Study on the Qualitative Value of Multimodal Ultrasonography for ACR-TIRADS 4 Thyroid Nodules Ranging from 1 cm to 1.5 cm.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Personalized prediction of lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a nomogram and web calculator.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study explored the clinical value and application of ultrasound contrast imaging technology in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) TR4 benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from the medical records of 40 patients who met the inclusion criteria between January 2020 and December 2023. Each patient was evaluated using the ACR TI-RADS classification and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). The agreement between pathological outcomes and ultrasound indicators and the diagnostic value and significance of each parameter were assessed.
resultsThe diameters did not differ between benign and malignant nodules (P = 0.324). Ring enhancement was closely associated with benign thyroid nodules, with a negative predictive value of 100%. Homogeneous enhancement and enhancement intensity showed good diagnostic value for pathological results, with an area under the curve (AUC) > 0.8. This parameter showed a high diagnostic value for serial and parallel combinations of homogeneous enhancement and enhancement intensity, with a sensitivity of 77.8% and specificity of 85.7% for the serial combination and 100% and 71.4%, respectively. for the parallel combination.
conclusionAmong ACR TI-RADS TR4 nodules, diameter 1.0-1.5 cm was not significantly correlated with a benign or malignant nature. Nodules featuring ring enhancement with ring-enhancing features should be considered benign. Similarly, nodules showing no, homogeneous, or high enhancement with clear borders on CEUS imaging may be benign. However, nodules with uneven low enhancement or unclear borders may be malignant. Therefore, uneven and low enhancement on CEUS imaging may have a high diagnostic value for malignant nodules. Moreover, the combination of these features may have even higher specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.