Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540199›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

Patient-centric knowledge graphs: a survey of current methods, challenges, and applications.

Hassan S Al Khatib, Subash Neupane, Harish Kumar Manchukonda, Noorbakhsh Amiri Golilarz, Sudip Mittal, Amin Amirlatifi, Shahram Rahimi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metabolic syndrome and a broken heart: trust your gut or risk your heart.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hassan S Al KhatibDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.
Subash NeupaneDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.
Harish Kumar ManchukondaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.
Noorbakhsh Amiri GolilarzDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.
Sudip MittalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.
Amin AmirlatifiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.
Shahram RahimiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.

Funding

MyDocSaid: Deep Learning for Patient-Centric Record, Summarization, and Analysis of Medical ConversationsR41NR021089 · NINR · POTENTIA ANALYTICS INC · PI MARHAMATI, NINA · 2024 to 2024
$284k
NINR NIH HHS R41 NR021089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-Centric Knowledge Graphs (PCKGs) represent an important shift in healthcare that focuses on individualized patient care by mapping the patient's health information holistically and multi-dimensionally. PCKGs integrate various types of health data to provide healthcare professionals with a comprehensive understanding of a patient's health, enabling more personalized and effective care. This literature review explores the methodologies, challenges, and opportunities associated with PCKGs, focusing on their role in integrating disparate healthcare data and enhancing patient care through a unified health perspective. In addition, this review also discusses the complexities of PCKG development, including ontology design, data integration techniques, knowledge extraction, and structured representation of knowledge. It highlights advanced techniques such as reasoning, semantic search, and inference mechanisms essential in constructing and evaluating PCKGs for actionable healthcare insights. We further explore the practical applications of PCKGs in personalized medicine, emphasizing their significance in improving disease prediction and formulating effective treatment plans. Overall, this review provides a foundational perspective on the current state-of-the-art and best practices of PCKGs, guiding future research and applications in this dynamic field.

Indexed as

generative AIknowledge graphnatural language processingpatient-centricpersonalized healthcare

Identifiers

PMID39540199
PMCPMC11558794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.