Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540196›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Factors Influencing Bile Duct Injuries: A Dreaded Complication of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Anushka Jindal, Nana Yaw Afriyie Badu, Chiko Katiki, V Jaswitha S Ponnapalli, Kesha J Desai, Sadia Mansoor, Lubna Mohammed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anushka JindalSurgery, University Hospital Sussex, Worthing, GBR.
Nana Yaw Afriyie BaduSurgery, University of Ghana, Accra, GHA.
Chiko KatikiEmergency, American International School of Medicine, Alpharetta, USA.
V Jaswitha S PonnapalliPsychiatry, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Kesha J DesaiMedicine, Medical College Baroda, Vadodara, IND.
Sadia MansoorInternal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Lubna MohammedInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bile duct injuries (BDIs) are dreaded complications of one of the most common general surgical procedures. The injury impacts the quality of life and may have several long-term complications. In some cases, it can also lead to mortality. This paper aims to review works that have already been published about bile duct injuries and elaborate on the factors leading to it. This includes elaborating on both surgical and non-surgical factors. It also plans to highlight practices and methods to avoid BDIs. Medical research databases were searched using cholecystectomy and bile duct injuries as keywords. Papers including pre-operative or intraoperative factors, that may cause bile duct injuries, were further shortlisted for this study. Understanding and knowledge of anatomy plays a key role in bile duct injuries and is essential before performing the surgery. Factors related to the patients, surgeons, and logistics also play a major role in causing bile duct injuries. Bile duct injuries can be reduced using certain strategies like the B SAFE strategy, R4U line, bail-out methods, imaging techniques along with referrals to Hepatobiliary specialist centers to avoid bile duct injuries.

Indexed as

bile duct injurycholecystectomygall bladder surgerylaparoscopic cholecystectomy complicationpost cholecystectomy bile duct injury

Identifiers

PMID39540196
PMCPMC11559437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.