Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39540112›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and translational science2024

Engaging communities in therapeutics clinical research during pandemics: Experiences and lessons from the ACTIV COVID-19 therapeutics research initiative.

David A Wohl, Stacey J Adam, Kevin W Gibbs, Ari L Moskowitz, Thomas L Ortel, Upinder Singh, Nikolaus Jilg, Teresa H Evering, William A Fischer, Babafemi O Taiwo and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

David A WohlInstitute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Stacey J AdamFoundation for the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4590-5175
Kevin W GibbsWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Ari L MoskowitzMontefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas L OrtelDepartments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Upinder SinghStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nikolaus JilgDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9154-2769
Teresa H EveringWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
William A FischerDivision of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Babafemi O TaiwoNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Eric S DaarDivision of HIV Medicine, Lundquist Institute at Harbor, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Christopher J LindsellDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3297-2811
Susanna NaggieDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7721-6975
Russell L RothmanVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sarah E DunsmoreNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
M Patricia McAdamsDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Julia VailDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Dushyantha JayaweeraDivision of Infectious Diseases, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

UCLA AIDS Prevention and Treatment Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069424 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Judith S. Currier, RAPHAEL J LANDOVITZ · 2012 to 2026
$51.8M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript addresses a critical topic: navigating complexities of conducting clinical trials during a pandemic. Central to this discussion is engaging communities to ensure diverse participation. The manuscript elucidates deliberate strategies employed to recruit minority communities with poor social drivers of health for participation in COVID-19 trials. The paper adopts a descriptive approach, eschewing analysis of data-driven efficacy of these efforts, and instead provides a comprehensive account of strategies utilized. The Accelerate COVID-19 Treatment Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) public-private partnership launched early in the COVID-19 pandemic to develop clinical trials to advance SARS-CoV-2 treatments. In this paper, ACTIV investigators share challenges in conducting research during an evolving pandemic and approaches selected to engage communities when traditional strategies were infeasible. Lessons from this experience include importance of community representatives' involvement early in study design and implementation and integration of well-developed public outreach and communication strategies with trial launch. Centralization and coordination of outreach will allow for efficient use of resources and the sharing of best practices. Insights gleaned from the ACTIV program, as outlined in this paper, shed light on effective strategies for involving communities in treatment trials amidst rapidly evolving public health emergencies. This underscores critical importance of community engagement initiatives well in advance of the pandemic.

Indexed as

antiviral treatment trialsCommunity engagementCOVID-19outbreaksoutreachpandemics

Identifiers

PMID39540112
PMCPMC11557280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.