ReviewAnnals of joint2024
Diagnostic strategies for chronic lateral ankle instability: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of joint, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of lateral ligaments augmentation and modified Brostrom repair in the treatment of chronic lateral instability of the ankle joint: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Mechanical Contribution of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament to Ankle Stability: 3D Anatomical Finite Element Analysis.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Article
- Current concepts in arthroscopic treatment for chronic lateral ankle instability: a clinical practice review.Annals of joint · 2026Review
- A LASSO regression-driven nomogram to predict functional outcomes after surgery for chronic lateral ankle instability.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Suture-Button Repair Improves Outcomes in Arthroscopically Diagnosed Chronic Syndesmotic Injury Despite Low Imaging Sensitivity.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Diagnosing chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) involves a comprehensive evaluation encompassing medical history, physical findings, and imaging examination. The optimal method of diagnosis of CLAI remains controversial. Therefore, the objective of this review was to summarize the current literatures regarding recent evolution and technical improvement of diagnostic methods for CLAI. Methods: A literature regarding the diagnosis of CLAI was reviewed on PubMed, including articles written in English until May 2024. Key Content and Findings: In the manual examination for the diagnosis of CLAI, the anterior drawer test is the standard evaluation for lateral ligament insufficiency. The anterolateral drawer test, meanwhile, which focuses more on lateral instability biomechanically, has also been performed. Ultrasonography is a point-of-care tool that is less invasive than stress radiography and can dynamically assess ligament integrity, making the diagnosis of CLAI more accurate and convenient. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful modality that allows extensive preoperative evaluation of ligamentous properties and associated osteochondral damage, and it is essential in the preoperative diagnosis of CLAI. Conclusions: A combination of physical examination and imaging studies is especially important to more accurately diagnose CLAI. Future research should focus on standardizing testing and measurement methods to objectively define CLAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.