ArticleRadiologia brasileira
Brain MRI in infants exposed to the Zika virus, with one-year follow-up: expanding the phenotype.
Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical, Neuroimaging and Video Electroencephalography Findings in Children With Congenital Zika Syndrome: An Analysis From a Neurorehabilitation Centre.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Follow-up brain MRI of infants with and without congenital Zika virus infection: paving the way for a thorough understanding of the consequences of Zika virus infection.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze longitudinal changes between two brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams performed one year apart in symptomatic infants with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) and normocephalic infants exposed to the Zika virus (ZIKV) prenatally. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study. Infants born to women who tested positive for ZIKV on reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction during pregnancy were classified into two groups: symptomatic infants with CZS and asymptomatic infants. All of the infants underwent brain MRI at presentation and after one year of follow-up. All MRI scans were evaluated independently by a pediatric radiologist and a pediatric neuroradiologist, and the infants underwent clinical monitoring by a pediatric neurologist. Results: The sample included 36 infants exposed to ZIKV perinatally. Therefore, a total of 72 MRI scans were evaluated. Among the 36 infants included a diagnosis of CZS was made in 25 (69.4%), of whom 18 presented with a combination of classic findings (including reduced brain volume, subcortical calcifications, brainstem hypoplasia, malformations of the corpus callosum, malformations of cortical development, and ventriculomegaly), as well as atypical findings such as hyperintense foci in the white matter on T2-weighted sequences. Of those same 25 infants, seven presented with mild lesions. Of the 11 normocephalic patients, five (13.9%) had atypical findings such as hyperintense foci in the white matter on T2-weighted sequences and no other manifestations of CZS, although there was mild neurological involvement. Six (16.6%) of the 36 patients had completely normal MRI scans with no neurological changes. No disease progression was observed during follow-up. Conclusion: In infants exposed to ZIKV perinatally, the frequency of classic and atypical findings on brain MRI seems to be associated with the neurological status. Brain MRI is an important diagnostic tool in the evaluation and monitoring of patients with congenital infection, because intracranial changes other than microcephaly can occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.